Humane-AI Asia

Li Yunkai v Liu3

Index
    authorship; AI; Copyright Law; China

    I. General information

    • Date of Judgement: 27.11.2023 ​

    • Issuing Authority: Beijing Internet Court, China​

    • Category: Copyright - Authorship of AI generated content ​

    • Plaintiff/Appellant: Mr. Li Yunkai​

    • Defendant/Respondent: Mr. Liu​

    • Keyworks: Authorship; AI; AI-generated artwork; Copyright Law; China

     A person with braided hair

AI-generated content may be incorrect. A person with long hair and a flower crown

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

    II. Dispute

    Recognition of copyright for works created by artificial intelligence (AI).

    The plaintiff, Mr. Li Yunkai, used the AI software Stable Diffusion to create an image of a young Asian girl and posted it on the social media platform Xiaohongshu. Mr. Li discovered that the defendant, a blogger named Liu, had used this image without permission and posted it on the Baijiahao platform owned by Baidu. Mr. Li sued Mr. Liu, alleging copyright infringement of the image he created.

    III. Legal basis

    Copyright Law of the People's Republic of China

    IV. Judgement

    Copyright Law of the People's Republic of China The court recognized that the image created by AI is copyrightable because the image reflects the initial intellectual investment of a human (Mr. Li) and meets the originality criterion.

    The court ruled that Mr. Liu must publicly apologize and compensate Mr. Li 500 yuan (approximately US$70)

    V. Remarks

    Copyright for AI-generated works may be recognized in this country, but may not be recognized in other countries. (Example: Thaler v. Perlmutter (USA), in which Thaler wanted AI to be recognized as the author – which was denied.)